Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

Scott Helms khelms at zcorum.com
Fri Feb 27 18:04:39 UTC 2015


AFC, the only shelf I worked on that would silently allow you to allocate
so much bandwidth to the ADSL cards that voice wouldn't work....


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Jack Bates <jbates at paradoxnetworks.net>
wrote:

>
> On 2/27/2015 11:27 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
>
>> Jack,
>>
>> I don't know what manufacturer you might be thinking of, but from a
>> standards point of view ADSL2 and ADSL2+ both have faster upstream speeds
>> than ADSL (G.dmt or T1.413)
>>
>>
>>
> Oh, standards wise, that is true. However, the gear they had (AFC)
> supported 8/1.5 for ADSL and I think 24/1 for ADSL2+. My point wasn't about
> standards, but an actual event. There is a perception that faster download
> is an upgrade, even if your upload is reduced. For the most part, they were
> right. Only a small percentage of the customers were upset at the upload
> decrease.
>
> The kicker was, the max downlink speed they allowed was 10. If they could
> have supported the right annex, they could have had more upload. Vendor
> limitations and such. :(
>
>
> Jack
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list