v6 deagg

Mon Feb 23 10:46:29 UTC 2015

On Feb 20, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:

> Is deaggregation inherently undesirable? In some RIR LIR will not get new
No. Excessive deaggregation is undesirable, but we lack a method to teach
routers to enforce this subtlety and maybe also a wide agreement on what 
is excessive.

> allocation, just because LIR lacks INET connectivity between their datacenter
> or pop.
> This wasn't issue in IPv4, because you actually could reasonably fill your
> IPv4 allocation and were eligible for another allocation for your
> discontinuous locations.
But at least in the RIPE region this can be easily solved by 
deaggregating /32s out of your /29.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 648 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150223/e55ebb48/attachment.sig>