draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

Sat Feb 21 14:28:16 UTC 2015

RFC7349 is a nice summary of everything we¹re still missing wrt MPLS and
is relatively recent so should be close to up to date.  In addition to the
MPLS shortcomings, it also touches on recent IGP updates:

>3.2.3.1.  Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP)
>
>   RFC 3630 [RFC3630] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering
>   capabilities to OSPF Version 2.  New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in
>   RFC 5329 [RFC5329] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks in OSPF
>   Version 3.
>
>   RFC 5305 [RFC5305] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering
>   capabilities to IS-IS.  New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in RFC 6119
>   [RFC6119] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks.
>
>   Gap: None.

When you talk to your vendor, ask what code will support these RFC¹s.

-Josh

>On 2/21/15, 6:00 AM, "nanog-request at nanog.org" <nanog-request at nanog.org>
>wrote:
>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 1
>>Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:00:07 -0500
>>From: Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com>
>>To: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
>>Cc: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>, Juniper-Nsp
>>      <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
>>      <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
>>Message-ID:
>>      <CAE_ug16FGyQXsTuyP9o+uTDhdNpGBgFE6H5EbU4TDHb73Vm1UQ at mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>>
>>>On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite
>>>like
>>>> to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget...
>>>>
>>>> (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last
>>>> piece for me.)
>>>
>>>Is there 4PE implementation to drive IPv4 edges, shouldn't be hard to
>>>accept
>>>IPv6 next-hop in BGP LU, but probably does not work out-of-the-box?
>>>Isn't Segment Routing implementation day1 IPV4+IPV6 in XR?
>>>
>>>--
>>>   ++ytti
>>>
>>
>>I would gladly take OSPFv2/OSPFv3/ISIS+SR over LDP, but I'm seeing that
>>is
>>not all that is needed.
>>
>>I also need some flavor of L2VPN (eVPN) and L3VPN (VPNv4/VPNv6) working
>>over IPv6.
>>
>>IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.
>>
>>--
>>Tim:>
>>
>

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.