v6 deagg
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
Sat Feb 21 19:06:37 UTC 2015
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> but then we considered that v6 allocations seem to be /32s, and the
> longest propagating route seems to be /48, leaving 16 bits with which
> the deaggregators can play. while in v4 it was /24s out of a /19 or
> /20, four or five bits.
>
> this does not bode well.
Howdy,
I took a look at what it might take to keep TE-based disaggregation
under control back in 2009. This is what I came up with:
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-June/014351.html
Needless to say, the sparse allocation expandable netmask strategy
we're using instead doesn't have many levers we can grab for control.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list