Checkpoint IPS

Roland Dobbins rdobbins at arbor.net
Sun Feb 8 18:26:30 UTC 2015


On 8 Feb 2015, at 23:00, BPNoC Group wrote:

> Mr Dobbins' slides/presentation gives an idea that a proxy (waf, 
> whatever) fits sitting unprotected among routers and application 
> servers, while its also stateful and fragile enough to deserve 
> previous protection.

from p.16 of the presentation in question:

'If stateful firewalls cannot be immediately removed from the 
architecture, they must be protected against DDoS via S/RTBH, flowspec, 
IDMS, et. al., just like servers!'


from p.19 of the presentation in question:

'Load-balancers must be protected against DDoS - stateless ACLs for 
policy enforcement, S/RTBH, flowspec, IDMS, and so forth.'


from p.28 of the presentation in question:

'Reverse-proxy farms must be protected from DDoS via S/RTBH, flowspec, 
IDMS, et. al.'

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>



More information about the NANOG mailing list