de-peering for security sake
clayton at mnsi.net
Fri Dec 25 22:12:04 UTC 2015
Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response.
Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
> This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports.
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG