ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net
Thu Dec 17 17:30:32 UTC 2015
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> On 16/Dec/15 18:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
>> In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are
>> facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat
> This could be a function of the size of your ESP.
> The 5Gbps ESP can handle 256,000 NAT sessions, while the 200Gbps ESP
> will do 4,000,000 NAT sessions with a per-second setup rate of 300,000
> Of course, it makes little sense to upgrade if you run out of sessions
> before you hit the NAT throughput ceiling, so other vendors may be more
> commercially palatable.
Thats right but as you mentioned that its commercially palatable, however I don’t know if the other vendors are the same performance as ASR1000! this was my question if someone recommend another vendor.
More information about the NANOG