de-peering for security sake

Andrew Kirch trelane at
Fri Dec 25 23:54:09 UTC 2015

Speaking as a former DNSBL operator, NANOG has a poor history of
dealing with those who report abuse as well.

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports,
>> normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate
>> abuse albeit compromised machines
> This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do
> not respond to abuse reports.
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at

More information about the NANOG mailing list