de-peering for security sake

Clayton Zekelman clayton at
Fri Dec 25 22:12:04 UTC 2015

Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response.

Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
> This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports.
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at

More information about the NANOG mailing list