de-peering for security sake

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Dec 25 03:25:24 UTC 2015


Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a discussion has started up in just the last year, and how many more times in the past 16 or so years?

Mind you, back in say 2004, this discussion would have run to 50 or 60 emails at a bare minimum, in no time at all.

--srs

On 25-Dec-2015, at 6:55 AM, Stephen Satchell <list at satchell.net> wrote:

>> On 12/24/2015 04:50 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>> Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having
>> a tangible mitigation plan in place.
> 
> While you thing you are making a snarky response, it would be handy for end users to be able to turn on and off access to other countries retail.



More information about the NANOG mailing list