marka at isc.org
Thu Dec 17 00:57:29 UTC 2015
While we will get us there eventually it will be at the considerably more expensive
for everyone involved. There is also a distinct lack of a working free market in most
of the world. There isn't one in Australia. From what I read there isn't one in most
of the developed nations in the world including the US.
On 17/12/2015, at 11:14 AM, Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:
> Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will get us all there eventually.
> I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain and do what I want. :)
> -mel beckman
>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>> This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need
>> to NAT yet. We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>>> On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists at camonson.com> wrote:
>>> We need to make IPv4 painful to use. Adding delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
>>> be one way to achieve this. Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
>>> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.
More information about the NANOG