IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

joel jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Sun Dec 6 18:38:33 UTC 2015

On 12/5/15 9:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 17:43 , Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the
>>> global v6 internet
>> if A does not peer with B,
>> then for all A and B
>> they are evil partitioners?
>> can we lower the rhetoric?
>> randy
> Does that remain true for values of A where A is willing to peer with
> B, but B refuses to peer with A?

These are (mostly) reasonable business decisions engaged by (mostly)
reasonable actors.  both providers have tools available to them to
address the partition unilaterally as one of them does in ipv4  where
they so inclined.

Neither provider has significant numbers of single homed eyeballs
marooned behind them which would be bad.

> Owen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20151206/703f6afb/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list