Peering + Transit Circuits
John Osmon
josmon at rigozsaurus.com
Wed Aug 19 00:30:45 UTC 2015
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:27:53PM +0000, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation,
> I am still trying to figure out the realistic business case where
> doing something like this would make sense to any party.
> (unless purely malicious or in error).
I'm sure others will reply as well, but in case it helps someone
googling in years to come...
Let's look at ParasiteNet, a content heavy network with three BGP
peerings:
- Transit provider A via 100Mbps
- Transit provider B via 100Mbps
- Peer P via 1GBps (who also buys from provider B at 10G)
If ParasiteNet needed to push more than 100Mbps to provider B, they
might be tempted to route the traffic to peer P, even though peer P
didn't advertise those routes.
ParasiteNet gets a free ride if peer P doesn't notice what is going on
(until they need more than 100Mbps inbound).
I've been told of an occurance of this when a private network started
peering with an edu network. Once the link was up, an absurd amount of
traffic went across the link -- all destined for "the Internet" rather
than the edu network.
When the edu network shutdown the link, they were threatened with
lawsuits...
More information about the NANOG
mailing list