Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

Tue Aug 11 14:42:57 UTC 2015

We have processed just under a million anomalies with this software, we use the Chelsio cards for filtering. We had some troubles with packet loss on the filter side until we started using those which were a new feature in the latest release.

If you have any questions I would be happy to answer them.

Regards,
Nick Rose | CTO 
Enzu Inc 
nick.rose at enzu.com 
www.enzu.com <http://www.enzu.com/>

On 8/11/15, 2:14 AM, "NANOG on behalf of marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org on behalf of marcel.duregards at yahoo.fr> wrote:

>anybody from this impressive list ?:
>
>https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>
>-- Marcel
>
>
>
>On 11.08.2015 03:28, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
>>>
>>>> Once setup correctly. very good product - it's been running for 8
>>>> months now and hasn't had any issues. It's been very reliable.
>>>
>>> I'll bite - (roughly) how many times has it triggered and mitigated
>>> an actual DDoS during those 8 months?  We probably draw different
>>> conclusions from "8 months and 1 DDoS" reliable and "8 months of
>>> 5-a-week" reliable...
>>>
>>
>>
>> I think that would definitely depend on how the network is base-lined.
>>
>> That is sometimes more of an art than a science. :-)
>>
>> - - ferg
>>
>>
>> - --
>> Paul Ferguson
>> PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
>> Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iF4EAREIAAYFAlXJT7EACgkQKJasdVTchbJXoQD+Mhyy7gwtMkp+mdaEUiqvwlWe
>> 70mSH8n5ALmcp+qOqMoBAKo60u/ryb9IdvsclzPpoAvq+r9CtZgh+t/9YpkUIgnP
>> =d7d1
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>