Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation

Fri Aug 7 06:15:40 UTC 2015

Hi Jeff

As our priority, we will do MPLS VPN, IPv6, Flowspec firstly. In the future, we will consider multicast and EVPN.
Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jeff.tantsura at ericsson.com] 
Sent: 2015年8月7日 14:06
To: Peng Xiao (penxiao)
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation

Hi Peng,

Good stuff!

Any plans for multicast, RTC and EVPN AF's?

Regards,
Jeff

> On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Peng Xiao (penxiao) <penxiao at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Ipv6 and other address families are under development. We have already designed the data structures for them as you can see from the documentation, but it's just some testing code and not stable and we are not doing them after careful consideration.
> But at last, they will come out.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu] 
> Sent: 2015年8月7日 0:16
> To: Peng Xiao (penxiao)
> Cc: Jahangir Hossain; xxnog at ledeuns.net; nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation
> 
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said:
>> Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support IPv4 now.
> 
> http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg
> 
> Seriously guys.  It's 2015.  We really don't care what you hack for your own use - but publicly announcing stuff that doesn't have IPv6 support is getting kind of embarassing...
> 
> *especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm still willing to cut a *little* slack for "two guys and a stack of empty pizza boxes" software....)
> 
> 