IPTV providers in IN/Chicago

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Apr 28 11:15:07 UTC 2015

On 28/Apr/15 12:52, Rob Seastrom wrote:
> And for the love of God, do SSM not ASM (requires igmpv3 or mld2).  I
> can expound on the problem space off-list if you like.

Agree that SSM will scale better in the long run. RP's are a thing of
the past.

In case your STB's don't support IGMPv3 (which is very possible), ensure
your router supports SSM Mapping (any decent vendor has this) and run
IGMPv3 on the port facing the STB.

If your STB's support IGMPv3, then you're in SSM heaven, and ASM can go
where RIP now lives.


More information about the NANOG mailing list