Saying goodnight to my GSR

Sat Sep 20 20:56:37 UTC 2014

> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?

Most of these, I'd imagine:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SCAVS.html

On 20 September 2014 14:25, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf at dessus.com> wrote:

>
> And what, exactly, is it vulnerable to?
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sterling
> >Sent: Saturday, 20 September, 2014 12:06
> >To: Bacon Zombie
> >Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> >Subject: Re: Saying goodnight to my GSR
> >
> >Again, you're focusing resentment towards someone who did the right
> >thing. Negative reinforcement will discourage others from taking
> >action and will discourage them from encouraging others to take
> >action.
> >
> >Let's focus on who still has vulnerable equipment and how to help
> >them. Let's not shame people who did the right thing
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie at gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >> OK thank you for decommissioning this.*
> >>
> >> * Only if you either had authority to do so for max 1 year or had no
> >> authority but were fighting to have it patches or replaced for years.
> >> On Sep 20, 2014 7:54 PM, "Daniel Sterling" <sterling.daniel at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Bacon Zombie <baconzombie at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > So when was the last time you patched this internet facing device?
> >>>
> >>> Isn't the better response, thank you for decommissioning it?
> >>>
> >>> Can someone from cisco set up a poll or release whatever numbers they
> >>> have about how many of these old devices are still in service?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Dan
> >>>
>
>
>
>