jared at puck.nether.net
Thu Sep 11 13:34:21 UTC 2014
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing
>>> "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers."
>> This problem has been solved.
> do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem?
I talked to folks at 3549, they had a few tickets on it that took care of that.
I know we are reviewing our “alloc-boundary” filter to prevent such a large prefix passing again.
More information about the NANOG