pay.gov and IPv6

Sun Oct 26 21:32:18 UTC 2014

Have you tried emailing the server admin at pay.gov.clev at clev.frb.org?

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

>
> In message <CAFG21ohZ6MV6Tef_sWuwV6kmAZmHQ3nFRLq-FkdU38g=
> vL3nnQ at mail.gmail.com>
> , Todd Lyons writes:
> > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Random IPv6 complaint of the day: redirects from FCC.gov to pay.gov
> fail
> > >> when clients have IPv6 enabled. Work fine if IPv6 is off. One more
> set of
> > > Still broken, 7 months later. And again, I was too busy trying to pay
> to tr
> > y
> > > to pull a full set of logs. But if you do something on the FCC site
> that
> > > requires payment, the redirection flow dies halfway through if you're
> comin
> > g
> > > from IPv6 and works fine if you turn it off... so yet another computer
> in
> > > the house has IPv6 disabled until manually turned back on.
> >
> > FWIW, eftps.gov is also unreachable via ipv6. I tried all of miredo,
> > and my home Sixxs tunnel, and a HE tunnel from somewhere else.  I used
> > the 4or6 plugin to temporarily disable ipv6 and both sites loaded
> > straight away.
>
> If a site is unreachable your client should switch to IPv4 unless
> a IPv6 literal has been used.
>
> If your client take ages to switch over report a bug to the client
> vendor.
>
> It should not take ages to switch between multiple server addresses.
> IPv4 + IPv6 is just a example of multiple server addresses.
>
> > eftps.gov and pay.gov appear to be managed separately since both their
> > ipv4 and ipv6 netblocks are not in the same netblocks, and my path to
> > them is not the same:
> >
> > eftps.gov has IPv6 address 2620:10f:400e:a::13
> > mtr to eftps.gov via Sixxs:
> >  Host                                          Loss%   Snt   Last
> > Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> >  1. 2604:8800:100:82bc:ddcb:ae62:e3da:c91f      0.0%    16    0.9
> > 0.9   0.9   1.6   0.2
> >  2. gw-701.chi-03.us.sixxs.net                  0.0%    16   71.6
> > 72.4  68.6  78.3   2.4
> >  3. uschi03.sixxs.net                           0.0%    16   70.2
> > 71.8  69.2  78.8   2.4
> >  4. 2620:0:6b0:a::1                             0.0%    15   67.3
> > 73.3  67.3  79.7   3.2
> >  5. tge3-1.fr3.ord4.ipv6.llnw.net               0.0%    15   73.6
> > 75.4  70.1  85.4   4.9
> >  6. ve8.fr3.ord.ipv6.llnw.net                   0.0%    15   73.5
> > 79.7  72.9  90.4   5.7
> >  7. 2600:805:41f::5                             0.0%    15  104.4
> > 81.9  74.2 104.4   9.0
> >  8. 2600:806::12                                0.0%    15  105.2
> > 104.0 100.6 109.8   2.9
> >  9. 2600:806:12f::2e                            0.0%    15  134.5
> > 135.7 131.4 147.4   4.1
> > 10. 2620:10f:400e:1::4004                       0.0%    15  161.5
> > 145.9 131.5 163.8   9.9
> > 11. ???
> >
> > pay.gov has IPv6 address 2605:3100:fffd:100::15
> > mtr to pay.gov via Sixxs:
> >  Host                                          Loss%   Snt   Last
> > Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> >  1. 2604:8800:100:82bc:ddcb:ae62:e3da:c91f      0.0%    11    0.9
> > 0.9   0.7   1.1   0.1
> >  2. gw-701.chi-03.us.sixxs.net                  0.0%    11   70.8
> > 70.9  67.0  74.4   2.2
> >  3. uschi03.sixxs.net                           0.0%    11   73.7
> > 73.7  69.8  90.1   5.6
> >  4. 2620:0:6b0:a::1                             0.0%    11   70.6
> > 73.7  70.4  86.2   5.0
> >  5. tge3-1.fr3.ord4.ipv6.llnw.net               0.0%    11   72.4
> > 75.6  71.5  82.6   3.2
> >  6. ve8.fr3.ord.ipv6.llnw.net                   0.0%    11   76.1
> > 79.3  74.7  87.9   4.0
> >  7. tge32-3.fr3.dal.ipv6.llnw.net               0.0%    11   99.1
> > 100.1  96.4 106.2   2.7
> >  8. sl-st30-dal-te0-14-0-1.v6.sprintlink.net    0.0%    11   98.2
> > 102.0  98.2 111.0   4.4
> >  9. sl-crs1-fw-be40.v6.sprintlink.net           0.0%    11   99.5
> > 100.5  96.2 105.5   2.5
> > 10. sl-gw38-fw-po0-0.v6.sprintlink.net          0.0%    11   96.4
> > 98.8  96.4 105.1   2.6
> > 11. 2600:4:2000:4::9                            0.0%    11  100.2
> > 102.0  99.0 107.0   2.7
> > 12. ???
> >
> > I was hoping an eftps.gov or pay.gov employee was casting an eye this
> > way, but it doesn't look like anybody from there is subscribed to
> > NANOG.
> >
> > ...Todd
> > --
> > The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
> > If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
> > send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
>