ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)

Sun Oct 26 13:45:09 UTC 2014

it's just a consequence that our initial idea was just about to protect allocations of our members - not about secure routing at all

On 26 Oct 2014, at 14:40, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Oct 26, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 20% coverage in lacnic low?  how do ipv6 and dnssec compare (which is
>> damned sad)?  over 2,000 in ripe and over 8%?  how does that compare to
>> ipv6?  
>> 
>> arin, 388 and 0.7%, a joke.
> 
> LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question 
> was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs.
> You can clearly point to ARIN's legal treatment of the risks involved, 
> but that is not applicable in the APNIC case....
> 
> You don't feel there's any correlation between RIPE's IRR approach 
> and their RPKI success?   
> 
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN