Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's decision to switch
C. Jon Larsen
jlarsen at richweb.com
Wed Oct 22 16:43:53 UTC 2014
> Hardly. The discussion so far has been weighted very heavily on the
> side of Dana Carvey's "Grumpy Old Man"-style whining. "That's the way
> it was and we liked it!".
>
> The people that like systemd (like myself) have wisely learned that
> the people that hate systemd, hate it mostly because it's different
> from what came before and don't want to change. There's no way to
> argue rationally with that.
Incorrect assumption. systemd is a massive security hole waiting to happen
and it does not follow the unix philosophy of done 1 thing and do it
well/correct. Its basically ignoring 40 years of best practices. Thats why
folks that have been there, done that, dont want any part of it. Not
because its new, but because its a flawed concept.
You are free to use it, but it would be a poor choice for system that has
hopes of being secure.
> --
> Jeff Ollie
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list