IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Sat Oct 11 06:37:28 UTC 2014
On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal at snappytelecom.net> wrote:
> I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 space ? or some other technical reason ?
It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into a sinkole.
> (is a /64 address are a 'sinkhole' the only reason ? )
That's a pretty big reason not to use /64s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Equo ne credite, Teucri.
-- Laocoön
More information about the NANOG
mailing list