IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

Roland Dobbins rdobbins at arbor.net
Sat Oct 11 06:37:28 UTC 2014


On Oct 11, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal at snappytelecom.net> wrote:

> I am trying to understand what is sub-optimal about doing so...Waste of Ipv6 space ? or some other technical reason ?

It's wasteful of address space, but more importantly, it turns your router into a sinkole.

> (is a /64 address are a 'sinkhole' the only reason ? )

That's a pretty big reason not to use /64s.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

    		   	  -- Laocoön




More information about the NANOG mailing list