IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Sat Oct 11 06:00:21 UTC 2014
On Oct 11, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal at snappytelecom.net> wrote:
> For Router Loopback Address .... what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
In the BCOP, this is noted so that those who suboptimally address their p-t-p links with /64s can be consistently suboptimal by doing the same with their loopbacks, so that *all* their interfaces are sinkholes.
But the BCOP also talks about /128s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Equo ne credite, Teucri.
-- Laocoön
More information about the NANOG
mailing list