IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

Baldur Norddahl baldur.norddahl at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 20:42:52 UTC 2014


On 9 October 2014 22:32, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

>
> On Oct 10, 2014, at 3:25 AM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am sure there are. Tell me about them.
>
> This issue has been discussed on all the various operational lists many,
> many times over the years.
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6752>
>

The linked document talks about issues with using private IP addresses. I
am not suggesting that you do that. I am suggesting that you use _no_ IP
addresses on the links. Generally the devices will use the loopback IP,
which will be public, for your traceroutes and for ICMP.

None of the issues in RFC 6752 are applicable to the concept of using host
routes to peer loopback address instead of assigning link specific
addressing.

Regards,

Baldur



More information about the NANOG mailing list