large BCP38 compliance testing

Thu Oct 2 22:54:32 UTC 2014

In message <20141002224754.GA7606 at gsp.org>, Rich Kulawiec writes:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:24:18PM -0400, Brian Rak wrote:
> > What about providers who knowingly allow IP spoofing, because it's
> > profitable?
> 
> What about providers who knowingly host massive spam operations, because
> it's profitable?  As in:
> 
> 	http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks/
> 
> We've been down this road before.  Unless there is prompt, concerted,
> collective action (as there was AGIS) then there is zero reason for those
> behind such operations to do anything but keep collecting dirty money.
> 
> So it's all good and well to *know* where the problems are: that's
> useful.  But if the goal is to actually make the problems go away,
> then that'll require fingers on keyboards implementing null routing,
> firewalling, blacklisting etc.

Or it will require legislation and I will assure that whatever is
written not be liked.  On the other hand everyone one in the country
will be in the same boat.

> ---rsk
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org