.sj/.bv == privacy?

Dave Crocker dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Wed Oct 1 16:08:19 UTC 2014


> for the purpose of a specialty domain registry where registrants (such as hosting companies) would be contractually required to guarantee privacy to their end customers.


Hmmm...

Until privacy is a feature across many/most hosting services, anyone
specializing it is, in effect, identifying traffic that is likely to be
/more/ interesting for those wishing to inspect the data.

In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as
attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net



More information about the NANOG mailing list