bidirectional traceroute (was Re: Cogent (was Re: NTT NOC Contact))
Ken Chase
math at sizone.org
Thu Nov 27 16:39:07 UTC 2014
Never assume symetric routing (though Im almost old enough to remember
the days of.)
Wish there was some kinda bidirect traceroute protocol widely supported.
Mostly we only have lg's via www if they happen to have been setup for such
occasions :(
I know there were a few small projects with this kinda idea, but I am not sure
if any of them really got anywhere.
/kc
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:00:32AM -0500, Jared Mauch said:
> Seems your MTR sees loss within the Cogent (174) network prior
>to reaching the NTT network.
>
> I think you perhaps need cogent assistance?
>
> - Jared
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:58:59AM -0500, james jones wrote:
>> We are getting a huge amount of traffic loss while sending to JP. I am
>> trying to figure out if the problem is with cogent or NTT. Thoughts? Here
>> is a MTR trace:
>>
>> login02.bal (0.0.0.0)
>> Thu Nov 27 01:58:22 2014
>>
>> Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
>>
>>
>> Packets Pings
>>
>> Host
>> Loss% Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
>>
>> 1. v122-router.bal
>> 0.0% 0.2 0.3 0.2 3.7 0.5
>>
>> 2. netscaler3.bal
>> 0.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0
>>
>> 3. gw1.bal.brightcove.com
>> 0.0% 0.6 1.9 0.2 12.4 3.2
>>
>> 4. border1.te9-1.brightcoveinc-2.chg004.pnap.net
>> 2.1% 0.9 2.1 0.4 36.5 6.5
>>
>> 5. core1.te2-2-bbnet2.chg.pnap.net
>> 0.0% 2.1 2.1 1.8 3.5 0.4
>>
>> 6. te0-5-0-33.ccr21.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 0.0% 1.9 2.5 1.8 16.2 2.5
>>
>> 7. be2003.ccr42.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 0.0% 2.4 2.5 2.3 3.7 0.3
>>
>> 8. be2157.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 0.0% 14.4 14.3 14.1 17.4 0.5
>>
>> 9. be2133.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 0.0% 52.0 52.1 51.7 54.0 0.4
>>
>> 10. be2165.ccr22.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 23.4% 52.7 52.8 52.6 53.3 0.2
>>
>> 11. be2047.ccr21.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 67.4% 53.5 53.5 53.4 53.8 0.1
>>
>> 12. verio.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com
>> 29.8% 53.1 53.2 53.0 54.6 0.4
>>
>> 13. ae-6.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
>> 67.4% 53.3 59.3 53.0 82.3 10.1
>>
>> 14. ae-4.r20.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net
>> 29.8% 138.2 140.6 138.1 173.9 7.6
>>
>> 15. ae-1.ocn.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net
>> 69.6% 153.8 153.9 153.8 154.0 0.0
>>
>> 16. 60.37.27.92
>> 97.8% 154.1 154.1 154.1 154.1 0.0
>>
>> 17. 114.147.63.70
>> 36.2% 194.0 167.0 155.0 203.5 16.7
>>
>> 18. 118.23.13.2
>> 63.0% 155.8 155.9 155.8 156.1 0.1
>>
>> 19. 118.23.14.66
>> 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>
>> 20. p3044-ipngnfx01marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp
>> 97.8% 150.8 150.8 150.8 150.8 0.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Job Snijders <job at instituut.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:51:59AM -0500, james jones wrote:
>> > > Looking to discuss a routing issue going through NTT's link to JP.
>> >
>> > Feel free to contact me off-list with the details.
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Job
>> >
>
>--
>Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
>clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
--
Ken Chase - math at sizone.org Toronto
More information about the NANOG
mailing list