Transit, Exchange Point Agreements, and Acceptable Use?
Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster at mykolab.com
Fri Nov 21 15:12:48 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 11/21/2014 7:07 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
> Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster at mykolab.com> writes:
>
>> I'll apologize up front if this offends anyone's sensitivities as
>> to what is relevant for list conversation... but one sentence in
>> this Channel4 News story (from what I understand, Channel4 is a
>> very popular news source in the UK) struck me as perhaps in
>> violation of some sort of peering and/or transit agreement. Cable
>> and Wireless:
>>
>> "...even went as far as providing traffic from a rival foreign
>> communications company, handing information sent by millions of
>> internet users worldwide over to spies."
>>
>> The entire article is here:
>>
>> http://www.channel4.com/news/spy-cable-revealed-how-telecoms-firm-worked-with-gchq
>>
>>
>>
My question is this: Do willful actions such as these violate peering,
>> transit, and/or exchange agreements in any way?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - ferg
>
> Welcome to the modern age of communications. The privacy nuts and
> tinfoil hat types turned out to be correct. Assume that you have
> no privacy and encrypt everything you do. Or just stop caring
> about privacy all together. Either way, not much has actually
> changed.
>
Well, yes, of course I understand that you should encrypt any & every
thing that you wish to protect, and believe me -- I (more than most)
understand the long tug of war between telecommunications companies
and national intelligence services.
But you did not address my question... ;-)
Cheers,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlRvVnAACgkQKJasdVTchbIviwEAk1UQEY/sCwGi0Qua15lCzdPv
NWHofFXWJkk+GEjGYMMA/RuOJcL4r+DCr526WsFU/8lGYk80M78pB7rhogN9pgs2
=Oxw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list