Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 23:00:54 UTC 2014


On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. <contact at winterei.se> wrote:
> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
> justification these days, sadly.

why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips,
right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have
justification for  a /23 ... it seems to me.

>
> Good luck nonetheless.
>
>
> On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
>> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due
>> to
>> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>>
>> /Ruairi
>>
>> On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
>>> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>>>
>>> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>>>
>>> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear List,
>>>>
>>>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
>>>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
>>>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
>>>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
>>>> public IP.
>>>>
>>>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
>>>> cheap and on-net.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> /Ruairi
>>>>
>>>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list