Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions

Paul S. contact at winterei.se
Mon Nov 10 14:06:49 UTC 2014


I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as 
justification these days, sadly.

Good luck nonetheless.

On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
> Hey,
>
> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> /Ruairi
>
> On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
>> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>>
>> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>>
>> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List,
>>>
>>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
>>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
>>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
>>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
>>> public IP.
>>>
>>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
>>> cheap and on-net.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Ruairi
>>>
>>


More information about the NANOG mailing list