Default routes on BGP routers with full feeds
fred at web2objects.com
Tue Nov 4 18:37:36 UTC 2014
Long time I had the same opinion, however, if someone operates a network
with multiple upstream providers the operator should be able to afford a
proper out of band console access which solves this issue completely.
I would only accept a default route on Uplinks where I am only receiving
a partial table for rescue purpose.
> I often opt to leave one or more default routes configured with low
> priority (lower than BGP). The thinking is that if there is a fault with
> BGP, the router will still operate and the fault can be corrected
> remotely (in-band). The downside is that I might pass traffic for
> non-existing destinations an additional hop and put the load of
> generating an ICMP unreachable on someone else's router.
> Berry Mobley wrote on 11/4/2014 11:47 AM:
>> I'm wondering how many of you who are multihomed also add default
>> routes pointing to your providers from whom you are receiving full feeds.
>> If so, why? If not, why not?
More information about the NANOG