IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Fri May 23 01:14:06 UTC 2014


On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

>
> On May 22, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Livingood, Jason <
> Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration
> >>
> >> I suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram would
> >> IPv6 enable their services.  Same for pintarest.
> >
> > +1
> > We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a
> great
> > time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another June
> > 6 just around the corner. :-)
>
>
> I'm waiting to see Akamai and Cachefly follow the lead of Cloudflare and
> make everything IPv6 by default.  I remind vendors when I talk to them,
> "IPv6 first, then IP classic(tm)".



Jared,

Akamai has been v6 enabled for years. Customers have choices and know best.

Isn't your network still offering both as customer choices? :-)

Best,

-M<


More information about the NANOG mailing list