Large DDoS, small extortion
wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com
Thu May 22 17:26:48 UTC 2014
I could attribute a fair number of misdeeds to that book. ;)
On 5/22/14, 10:22 AM, "manning" <bmanning at karoshi.com> wrote:
>negotiation is fine… a weakness is presuming to know what the perp wants
> (and many times they don;t know themselves)
>so engagement is good “The Cuckoo's Egg” is worth the read…
>On 22May2014Thursday, at 8:23, Livingood, Jason
><Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>> On 5/22/14, 12:51 AM, "Beleaguered Admin" <dealing.with.ddos at gmail.com>
>>> This has been going on for a long time -- almost every detail is
>>> exactly the same as what is described here:
>>> He is in regular communication (via whois info and other collected
>>> contact data) asking for <$1000 USD sums to stop the attacks.
>> That article said that the company didn¹t want to negotiate with
>> criminals. As an aside I spent some time with a retired hostage
>> on Tuesday (which was fascinating BTW). He actually said negotiation is
>> always useful and sometimes paying a ransom demand can serve as a method
>> to track where the money goes, to identify all the actors involved for
>> later action (which may apply in this case). And sometimes financial
>> demands are dropped as a result of negotiation.
>>> Is it worth talking to law enforcement? Some of these have been >500k
>>> costs to the customer, but we assume the person doing it isn't in any
>>> western country, so maybe it doesn't even matter?
>> You may find the law enforcement more interested in engaging within you
>> than you might think.
More information about the NANOG