Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
mdikkema at gmail.com
Thu May 8 14:55:22 UTC 2014
I could never get an definitive answer out of TAC or my account team, but I
believe the ASR1002 w/ESP5 is also affected.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Nikolay Shopik <shopik at inblock.ru> wrote:
> Asr1002-f may have problem as it limited to 512k iirc
> > On 08 мая 2014 г., at 2:45, Shawn L <shawnl at up.net> wrote:
> > Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well? I searched around but
> > couldn't find any information.
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Irwin, Kevin <Kevin.Irwin at cinbell.com>
> > Date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
> > 6500/7600 routers.
> > To: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
> > I¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already,
> > especially on the 9K¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it
> > comes to the 512K limit.
> > Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the
> > scaling, those old cards don¹t always like to come back.
> >> On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon at cox.net> wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> >>> Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community
> >>> talks about for the next decade.
> >> Like we have for the last two?
> >> --
> >> Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
> >> of System Administrators:
> >> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
> >> learn from their mistakes.
> >> (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive
> > this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
> > document.
More information about the NANOG