Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

Brandon Ewing nicotine at warningg.com
Thu May 8 23:30:29 UTC 2014


On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:39:13PM +0000, Drew Weaver wrote:
> 
> I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of concerted effort to remind folks about the IPv4 routing table inching closer and closer to the 512K route mark.
> 


Closer to?  Internap announces 507K prefixes to me today.  Coupled with the
prefixes I carry in iBGP internally, I've been sitting at 511K for quite
some time, and at occasions, exceeded 512K in the last 2 weeks.

L3 Forwarding Resources
             FIB TCAM usage:                     Total        Used       %Used
                  72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM)     802816      511848         64%
IP routing table maximum-paths is 32
Route Source    Networks    Subnets     Overhead    Memory (bytes)
connected       0           31          3012        4464
static          1           78          17456       11376
ospf 1          1           310         22392       44784
  Intra-area: 110 Inter-area: 160 External-1: 0 External-2: 41
  NSSA External-1: 0 NSSA External-2: 0
bgp 23456       167707      343507      36808128    75466680
  External: 507479 Internal: 3735 Local: 0
internal        6054                                13246152
Total           173763      343926      36850988    88773456



-- 
Brandon Ewing                                        (nicotine at warningg.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140508/7a66ecae/attachment.pgp>


More information about the NANOG mailing list