Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
alex at pssclabs.com
Wed May 7 23:20:36 UTC 2014
> On May 7, 2014, at 6:47 PM, "Shawn L" <shawnl at up.net> wrote:
> Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well? I searched around but
> couldn't find any information.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Irwin, Kevin <Kevin.Irwin at cinbell.com>
> Date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
> 6500/7600 routers.
> To: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
> I¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already,
> especially on the 9K¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it
> comes to the 512K limit.
> Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the
> scaling, those old cards don¹t always like to come back.
>> On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon at cox.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
>>> Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community
>>> talks about for the next decade.
>> Like we have for the last two?
>> Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
>> of System Administrators:
>> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
>> learn from their mistakes.
>> (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive
> this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
More information about the NANOG