US patent 5473599

• Previous message (by thread): US patent 5473599
• Next message (by thread): US patent 5473599
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> CARP uses a VRRP version number that has not been defined by VRRP,
> hence there is no conflict there, either.  The link from the quote
> above has a quote from Henning.

Which means that in addition to squatting on the VRRP port, they are also squatting on a version number that I'm betting the IETF did not grant to them for that purpose and may use for another purpose at a later date.

Owen

• Previous message (by thread): US patent 5473599
• Next message (by thread): US patent 5473599
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]