US patent 5473599
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed May 7 21:42:19 UTC 2014
> The issue Jared is needing a consensus in a community where that may be
> impossible to achieve because of differing agendas - so does that mean
> that the protocol should not exist because the IETF would not grant it
> credence? Interesting.
There are just 256 numbers available in
https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers. We could decide that we
only assign them when there's a consensus or we could go with the
alternative. Which do you prefer?
There are a whole bunch of well-known policies. On the whole, the less
limited the resource is the more liberal the policy. Maybe that's wrong and
we should make everything FCFS.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5495 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NANOG