Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun May 4 21:37:03 UTC 2014


On Saturday, May 03, 2014 11:26:27 AM Måns Nilsson wrote:

> Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS
> infrastructure could be built without v4 space, demoting
> v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS
> standards wg seems content with status quo.

There is work ongoing in the MPLS IETF WG on identifying the 
gaps that various MPLS applications have so they can be 
prepared for IPv6 MPLS control and data planes.

Long overdue, if you ask me, but at least it's starting to 
get some attention.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140504/eb4bac55/attachment.pgp>


More information about the NANOG mailing list