Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

Chris Grundemann cgrundemann at gmail.com
Fri May 2 21:58:42 UTC 2014


Hi Mans,

On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Måns Nilsson <mansaxel at besserwisser.org>wrote:

> This is a field where v4 next-hops are essential to make things
> work. <rant>In that context, allocating 100.64.0.0/10 to CGN was
> especially un-clever... </rant>
>

Would you expound a bit on what you mean here? I don't quite follow but I
am very interested to understand the issue.

Thanks!
~Chris

-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com


More information about the NANOG mailing list