why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

Fri Mar 28 13:41:22 UTC 2014

On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 06:22:32 -0700, Owen DeLong said:

> This assumes a different economic model of SPAM that I have been lead to
> believe exists.

> My understanding is that the people sending the SPAM get paid immediately and
> that the people paying them to send it are the ones hoping that the advertising/
> phishing/etc. are acted on.

Only because we haven't given them a way to monetize it immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140328/f05a6201/attachment.sig>