why IPv6 isn't ready for prime time, SMTP edition

Brandon Ross bross at pobox.com
Fri Mar 28 13:30:08 UTC 2014

On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Owen DeLong wrote:

> This assumes a different economic model of SPAM that I have been lead to 
> believe exists.
> My understanding is that the people sending the SPAM get paid 
> immediately and that the people paying them to send it are the ones 
> hoping that the advertising/phishing/etc. are acted on.

Fine, then the people paying the people who do the spamming have more of 
an incentive to pay higher rates and more spammers.  It doesn't really 
matter how may layers of abstraction there are, the point is that the main 
motivator has become more attractive.

Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:  2269442
                                                          Skype:  brandonross
Schedule a meeting:  http://www.doodle.com/bross

More information about the NANOG mailing list