ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal)
jcurran at arin.net
Thu Mar 27 21:56:01 UTC 2014
> On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:27 AM, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> i think your attemt to move the discussion to the arin ppml list
> exemplifies one core of the problem.
I offered ppml out of respect to the nanog subscribers, that is all...
> and this is aside from daniel's global measurement empire. not sure it
> is a registry's job to do this, but it is a serious contribution to the
> the ncc is engaged with its community on the subhects that actually
> interest operators and affect our daily lives.
> there is nothing of interest at an arin meeting, a bunch of junior
> wannabe regulators and vigilantes making an embarrassing mess. i've
> even taken to skipping nanog, if ras talks i can watch the recording.
> all the cool kids will be in warsaw. ops vote with our feet.
More information about the NANOG