owen at delong.com
Tue Mar 25 02:13:54 UTC 2014
On Mar 23, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>> But perhaps Randy is looking for the number of /24 equivalents
>> allocated to legacy resource holders who haven't also received an IPv6
>> direct allocation or other IPv4 direct allocation under an RSA?
> what percentage of address space is held by members and what percentage
> by non-members (lrsa-only is part of the latter)?
> what percentage of holding organizations are members and what percentage
> not members (lrsa-only being part of the latter)?
If you intend for RSA assignment holders to also be semi-randomly split between
the two categories, then, yes.
If not, then, your exact words do not say exactly what you intend.
More information about the NANOG