randy at psg.com
Mon Mar 24 23:53:23 UTC 2014
>>> You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.
>> where do i do that?
> Nick Hilliard
ahh. i see your error. i am not nick hilliard. he's the cute one.
> Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where
> folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can
> be stateless."
again, you put words in my mouth which were not there. i did not say v6
to v4 translation.
> Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day.
cool. then we can all go back to reality and whet people actually said.
More information about the NANOG