tmorizot at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 18:50:49 UTC 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> What sort of traction are you getting from that argument when you
> speak with enterprise security folks?
Actually, I never even had to make the argument in our enterprise. Our
cybersecurity organization already knew that overall NAT reduced rather
than enhanced network security and had a deeper real understanding of
security defense in depth than I did. I never had to convince anyone that
NAT wasn't a security feature. It sounds like we have so many enterprises
that do security poorly because many don't even understand the basics.
More information about the NANOG