tmorizot at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 18:37:16 UTC 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Alexander Lopez <alex.lopez at opsys.com>wrote:
> not to mention the cost in readdressing your entire network when you
> change an upstream provider.
> Nat was a fix to a problem of lack of addresses, however, the use of
> private address space 10/8, 192.168/16 has allowed many to enjoy a simple
> network addressing scheme.
Which is, of course, precisely the use case that ULA and NPTv6 (RFC 6296,
not to be confused with a non-existent NAT66) addresses....
More information about the NANOG