fergdawgster at mykolab.com
Sun Mar 23 23:21:50 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 3/23/2014 3:56 PM, Timothy Morizot wrote:
> My comments represent reality. Your security posture is much worse
> in an IPv4 only configuration than if you enable and control IPv6.
On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to
consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control,
administrative, and security issues addressed.
You can continue to deride our issues, and make derisive comments
until your heart's content, but it does not change reality.
And on that, it will be the last I say on the matter on NANOG.
Best & Cheers,
- - ferg
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG