Justin M. Streiner
streiner at cluebyfour.org
Sat Mar 22 19:51:17 UTC 2014
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 22/03/2014 19:35, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>> CGN also comes with lots of downside that customers are likely to find
>> unpleasant. For some operators, customer (dis)satisfaction might be the
>> driver that ultimately forces them to deploy IPv6.
> don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol translation is any less
> ugly than CGN.
True, but the ugliness of NAT64 and friends will decrease over time as
more people go v6. The ugliness of IPv4 in general, and CGN/LSN will
likely increase over time as people have to jump through more NAT hoops to
reach an increasingly ugly/fragmented IPv4 Internet.
More information about the NANOG