misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.)
bryan at digitalocean.com
Sat Mar 22 09:25:58 UTC 2014
Fair point. There are some situations that do need more than most, but
aren't they the ones that should be on ipv6 already???????
I know a few are shouldn't I be on ipv6 and that's fair too. I'm
plqnnning some speaking engagements to cover that. Its not blind and
On Mar 22, 2014 4:36 AM, "TJ" <trejrco at gmail.com> wrote:
> Millions of IPs don't matter in the face of X billions of people, and
> XX-XXX billions of devices - and this is just the near term estimate.
> (And don't forget utilization efficiency - Millions of IPs is not
> millions of customers served.)
> Do IPv6.
> On Mar 22, 2014 3:09 AM, "Bryan Socha" <bryan at digitalocean.com> wrote:
> > As someone growing in the end of ipv4, its all fake. Sure, the rirs
> > run out, but that's boring. Don't believe the fake auction sites.
> > Fair price of IP at the end is $1 for bad Rep $2 for barely used, $3 for
> > spam and $4 for legacy. Stop the inflation. Millions of IPS exist,
> > there is no shortage and don't lie for rirs with IPS left.
More information about the NANOG